
Why Experience Does Not Eliminate Risk Bias
Experience is often treated as a cure for poor judgment. The assumption is that with time and repeated exposure, people learn restraint, accuracy, and realism.

Experience is often treated as a cure for poor judgment. The assumption is that with time and repeated exposure, people learn restraint, accuracy, and realism.

When people encounter random outcomes, they instinctively expect balance. Wins should offset losses. High results should be followed by low ones. Over time, things are

Confidence often arrives early. Understanding takes time. In systems built around repeated decisions, constant feedback, and persistent uncertainty, this gap becomes especially visible. People grow

Efficient systems are designed to operate quickly and consistently. Information moves fast, responses converge, and outcomes reflect signals with minimal delay. From a technical standpoint,

Winning feels definitive. It has closure, relief, and a clean narrative of success. When an outcome goes our way, it is natural to assume we

Odds are commonly treated as predictions. The numbers appear to signal what will happen next, how likely an outcome is, or which side is “right.”

Probability figures often feel like predictions. When people see a numerical likelihood attached to an outcome, they instinctively interpret it as a statement about what

Decimal odds and fractional odds are often described as two different ways of expressing the same information. Technically, this is correct. Both formats quantify the

Odds are commonly described as reflections of probability. When numbers move, people assume they are tracking the likelihood of an outcome occurring. What is often

It is common to interpret probability figures, the numbers used to communicate risk, as predictions of what will happen. When a system assigns a high